One of the most overlooked obstacles to successful BPR project implementation is resistance from those whom implementer believe will benefit the most. Most projects underestimate the cultural effect of major process and structural change and as a result, do not achieve the full potential of their change effort. Many people fail to understand that change is not an event, but rather a management technique. BPR involves completely redesigning business processes for major efficiency gains, while process improvement focuses on making incremental changes to existing workflows. BPR helps your business identify inefficiencies, eliminate redundant processes, and implement new strategies for improved performance.

Here are the steps to successful BPR implementation:

• Business process engineering involves the redesign of process workflows by removing repetitive and redundant steps by analyzing existing human and automated workflows.
• After assessing and mapping the processes that currently drive the business, the redesign often aims to eliminate unproductive departments or layers and any redundancies of the operation.
• BPR also has much higher stakes because today’s roles and processes may be shelved entirely.
• One of the early adopters of BPR was Ford Motor Company, which implemented reengineering initiatives in the 1990s to streamline its manufacturing processes and improve competitiveness.

Be mindful of dependencies and resource requirements to successfully roll out the changes. Constantly monitor KPIs to assess the impact of the changes compared to the original workflows. This committee is formed by a group of senior managers who have championed the concept of reengineering within the organization. These managers have clear ideas and set specific goals for improving performance.

• The problem with BPR is that the larger you are, the more expensive it is to implement.
• It’s valuable to set up a diverse team because creativity is essential in analysing current business processes and developing new ones.
• That’s what differentiates BPR from process improvement which only focuses on functional or incremental improvement.
• BPR is not a one-time project, but a continuous journey of innovation and optimization.
• This committee is formed by a group of senior managers who have championed the concept of reengineering within the organization.

Resources

Abrahamson (1996) argued that fashionable management terms tend to follow a lifecycle, which for Reengineering peaked between 1993 and 1996 (Ponzi and Koenig 2002). They argue that Reengineering was in fact nothing new (as e.g. when Henry Ford implemented the assembly line in 1908, he was in fact reengineering, radically changing the way of thinking in an organization). Business Process Reengineering is a task that has a mix of positive and negative repercussions for a business. Although it seems like a straightforward process, there some several pros and cons that come with BPR implementation. An individual who is in charge of coordination of all the ongoing reengineering activities on a daily basis is the Czar. The primary responsibility of the Czar is to facilitate and develop the techniques and tools required by the organization to reengineer the workflow.

Implementing a new process often requires new systems, tools, or capabilities. Start by assessing existing tech infrastructure to determine necessary upgrades or integrations needed to support the redesigned process. This is also the ideal time to plan for training, change management, and resource reallocation to ensure a smooth transition. These may include reducing processing time by a specific percentage, cutting operational costs, or improving customer satisfaction scores.

Before a process is reviewed or adjusted, there needs to be a clear picture of the reason for the change. If the objectives are clear, it’s important to convince the employees that the changes are necessary. Making changes to internal operations and processes becomes more and more difficult as your enterprise grows in size because people get used to the old ways.

Get smarter with our workflow resources

A skilled team needs to be formed to get started with the changes and to minimise the chance of failure. It’s valuable to set up a diverse team because creativity is essential in analysing current business processes and developing new ones. For example, the problem is looked at from different perspectives and an accurate diagnosis is formed in the following steps.

IBM Credit Corporation re-engineered its credit checking and approval process by replacing specialists with generalists. These generalists were solely responsible for deciding customers’ creditworthiness. Moreover, a lot of time was saved in assessing the creditworthiness of customers.

BPR and digital transformation

As businesses scale, the processes that once worked may no longer be sustainable. BPR empowers organizations to design scalable, tech-driven workflows that fuel long-term growth. Let’s consider a business process reengineering example in the context of a financial services firm struggling with delays in today is the tax deadline client onboarding. Their existing process involved multiple disconnected systems, manual document collection, and redundant approval loops.

The team leader leads this committee and is responsible for arbitrating disputes and aiding process owners in making decisions about conflicting priorities. A group that is formed by insiders whose work involves the process that is being re-engineered and outsiders whose jobs are not affected by the changes to the process. This team is responsible for analyzing the existing process and supervising its redesign. The process owner is usually a senior-level manager in charge of a specific business process or unit. The responsibilities of the process owner include assembling the team together and overseeing the reengineering effort.

It’s about coming up with new ideas, like changing how you engage with customers at every point in the sales process. For instance, our article “Is it Time to Overhaul Your Processes?” provides some indicators that it may be time for a BPR project. Ideally, each stage requires input from groups from around the business to ensure that a full picture is being formed, with feedback and ideas being taken into consideration from a diverse range of sources. The next step is to identify and prioritize the improvements that are needed and those areas and processes that need to be scrapped. If you fail to do this, however, your business process reengineering efforts might be destined to fail long before they even start. Business process reengineering is the act of recreating a core business process with the goal of improving product output, quality, or reducing costs.

BPR redefines workflows to improve customer service, achieve higher levels of efficiency, and cut operational costs. Simply, the business process reengineering means to change the way an individual performs the work such that better results are accomplished. Hammer contended that the usual methods for boosting performance had failed to yield the improvements enterprises needed to operate in the 1990s. Product development cycle times were too slow, order fulfillment errors were too high and inventory levels were out of sync with demand at many companies.

Ensure you have the dependencies and resources to roll out your changes successfully. Develop new workflow and procedures, then communicate to the relevant stakeholders. Create test scenarios for any new or enhanced functions within your revamped process. According to Hammer, success depended on Ford’s willingness to break away from established assumptions about how operations should work, a concept he referred to as discontinuous thinking.

Step #2: Put Together a Team of Experts

The main aim of process improvement efforts is to tweak the existing process to optimize it. Process improvement efforts are not spread across the organization and require an incremental change in mindset. BPI helps identify process bottlenecks and recommends changes in specific functionalities.